LAPD Disclaimer

  • Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this weblog until the monitor has approved them. We encourage you to express your opinions about current events through respectful and insightful discussion. The Department reserves the right to refuse to post those comments that contain inappropriate language and/or material. Additionally, hyper-links or E-mail addresses will not be posted. To report or help us solve a crime go to lapdonline.org. To commend an employee or report employee misconduct - click here.

LAPD Photos

  • www.flickr.com

Translate


  • Disclaimer: The LAPDonline.org® website has made reasonable efforts to provide an accurate translation. However, no automated or computerized translation is perfect and is not intended to replace human or traditional translation methods. The official text is the English version of the LAPDonline.org® website. If any questions arise concerning the accuracy of the information presented by the translated version of the website, please refer to the English edition of the website, which is the official version.

Become a Fan

LAPD Blog RSS Feed

« Troubled, but No State of Siege | Main | Two Pacoima Youths Shot, One Dies »

November 27, 2024

Comments

Good job Harb officers, AND great job to the P-1. Honestly, the susp got off easy.... If they go for your gun, they can be shot.... PERIOD! I would like to congradulate Meyerowitz on showing incredible restraint on his part. Harb is a great div, and has great supervisors. Stay strong p-1, even if FID makes you feel like you did wrong... you DID WHAT YOU WERE TAUGHT! Thumbs up to you, and Harb Div.

In the press released it said the P-1 tried to apply the upper-body control hold. It appears that he never actually applied it because the press release says "tried." Shouldn't this fall in the same category, non-reportable or non-categorial UOF, when you deploy the OC, TAZER, or swing an impact device and never makes contact with the suspect. I can imagine the man hours that were used to investigate this incident if the Officer was never succesful in applying the hold.

Officers from the Port Authority were involved in the arrest?

Don't you mean the Port Police?

Port Authority cops are the ones that patrol NY/NJ's airports, ports and bridges.

By the way, PAPD lost 37 Officers on 9/11; the single most lives lost in one day for a l/e agency.

FYI.

Great to see two agencies helping each other out! Good job guys! Thank you all for your hard work.

Why is it that majority of other police departments authorize the use of choke hold for aggressive and combative suspects, but LAPD only authorizes it only when you would be justified to use DEADLY FORCE? I know it is a POLITICALLY TOUCHY subject in your great LIBERAL CITY FULL OF LIBERAL COUNCIL MEMBERS who drive your city to the ground each day they show up to work...I guess that happens having a full time incompetant council members who only care about themselves and re-election... But back to the subject... Why does not the LAPD do a research of other depts and how many times they have used the choke hold and how many of those people have actually died AND if the choke hold, when used properly stopped the suspects actions..Hmm let's see maybe if it was authorized and if it was used during the recent Hollywood video, you would not have seen any punches (even if it was justified. OIt's painless, the bad guy goes to sleep for a min and it's over,, Officers inuries are minimal, the suspects injuries are minimal and it's done! I would like to see which city /PD manager has what it takes to bring this to the table and have it reveiwed and let the officers have another option in using force when justified.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Chief Charlie Beck

Text-A-Tip

WebTip


Nixle


June 2015

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30        

iWATCH