LAPD Disclaimer

  • Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this weblog until the monitor has approved them. We encourage you to express your opinions about current events through respectful and insightful discussion. The Department reserves the right to refuse to post those comments that contain inappropriate language and/or material. Additionally, hyper-links or E-mail addresses will not be posted. To report or help us solve a crime go to lapdonline.org. To commend an employee or report employee misconduct - click here.

LAPD Photos

  • www.flickr.com

« BURGLARY/THEFT FROM VEHICLES | Main | Two Pedestrians Struck, One Killed »

December 13, 2024

Comments

Curious that there's utterly no mention in this blog of the huge sex scandal involving the LAPD, which is the lead, page-one story in the LA Times today.

Read it here at:

http://preview.tinyurl.com/yc8yv3

http://tinyurl.com/yc8yv3

I very much enjoyed this article. Job well done. Just goes to show the enormous amount of talent we have on this Department.

I'm not quite sure what this article has to do with the presence or absence of information on a sex scandal...

I thought this article was outstanding and I appreciate the chance to read it. I think the vast majority of people can understand that it is virtuous to defend the weak and the poor, but only a very rare individual has the courage to put their life and their livelihood on the line everyday and do it.

Well, Gina, what would you like mentioned about the "sex scandal"? Do you really believe anyone in the LAPD would comment on a pending personnel investigation or ongoing lawsuit???

I read the times (small caps intended) article and didn't see any news yet. It will be news if the allegations are proven true, or the complainant wins the lawsuit. Until then, complaints and lawsuits are a dime a dozen.

But one thing that is in need of addressing in the LAPD, which I don't hold my breath that it will, is the recent insult to all members of the Department contained in a newsletter. It was a joke of a commentary saying that "Favoritism" is not tolerated in the LAPD.

The whole promotional interview process is based on favoritism and cronyism and anyone who has gone through one knows it well. Yet, the Department warns employees about it.

During interviews for a counter-terrorism position, the panel is only concerned about the applicants favorite "core value" and how that Parks-era mandate is used on the applicant's daily work ethic. No questions are asked about the applicant's terrorism training or about the subject matter at hand. If the panel were to pick candidates according to knowledge of the subject matter and ability related to it, the right people would be picked. Instead, the interview panels use general questions about sexual harassment, affirmative action, and core values and don't even touch the subject matter the position is all about.

That way Captains and above can place their "favorite" employees in those coveted positions ahead of the best qualified.

That, ladies and gentlemen, is favoritism and cronyism and the City of L.A. is full of it.

So, a newsletter mentioning that favoritism is not tolerated is an insult to all city employees, espcifically hard-working LAPD personnel who try to get a coveted assignment.

Back to the streets where the most qualified do succeed, and the phonies pay their dues.

Dear Detective Beall, As I told you on the phone yesterday, your article was a beautiful affirmation of the good in law enforcement. Your lives matter to me, and I am grateful our lives matter to you, too. It was a real sweet way of saying it. And like I told you yesterday, I know it isn't easy being a white man in law enforcement today. Just putting the badge on takes a lot of heart. Kudos to you, warrior.

Gee, Gina - maybe that's because the article was posted on the 13th, and the story you are referring to broke on the 15th? Might want to check your dates before you jump on the bashing bandwagon...

Gina,
Well done. There probably isn't anything in what you just read because that wasn't his topic. I'm willing to bet you believe everything you read in the paper you find at work or in your driveway (latimes). Wether true or not, try and comment on the issue you read and then decided to comment on specificaly what you just read. Hope your having a wonderful holiday season.

Gee, what an irony. I moved from North Hollywood, CA to Amroy, MS in Monroe County, not far from Neshoba County about 2 years ago. A month or two after PASSING the LAPD written test AND the Ventura County Written/Physical exams. The main reason being that the State of California DENIES the average citizen the RIGHT to self-defense and the extreme liberal mindset of the population is taking the State downhill. Although I'm Hispanic and FACE PREJUDICE in my new home, I still like it here better than I did So Cal. The state of MS takes a heavy hand to the corruption PRACTICED DAILY within the LAPD. As THE state with the most prosecuted, corrupted publicly held offices in the NATION, this state is doing more to KEEP AND ENFORCE the law and justice. This state ACTUALLY ENFORCES the rules upon the 'rule makers'. In a sense, I feel I have more freedom and liberty than I did living amongst the government made up of more 'liberal' and 'equality' accepting individuals than I did growing up in CA and during my return to CA after my enlistment. Of course, preferential treatment and racism still exists here, but where does it not??? And by this, I also mean to implement that reverse discrimination ALSO exists.
The irony of a reverse migration for the sake of freedom and liberty without the loss of safety and security to a region with a history for the worst tract record for racism and prejudice.

I must commend Beall on his article. It was well written and I can totally relate to your words. We need more officers like you. God Bless! And, as for CP's demented beliefs. I feel sorry for that person and you will never win your lawsuits and it's a shame that you have to waste the taxpayers money. Move-on and let it be. I do not think you completely understood Beall's article. We need to recruit good officers and understand why people have lost asn interest and trust in this department. Negativity is not the answer.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Chief Charlie Beck

iWATCH


TexT-A-Tip

Anonymous WebTips

Nixle

August 2010

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        

Search

  • Google

    WWW
    lapdblog.typepad.com