LAPD Disclaimer

  • Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this weblog until the monitor has approved them. We encourage you to express your opinions about current events through respectful and insightful discussion. The Department reserves the right to refuse to post those comments that contain inappropriate language and/or material. Additionally, hyper-links or E-mail addresses will not be posted. To report or help us solve a crime go to lapdonline.org. To commend an employee or report employee misconduct - click here.

LAPD Photos

  • www.flickr.com

Translate


  • Disclaimer: The LAPDonline.org® website has made reasonable efforts to provide an accurate translation. However, no automated or computerized translation is perfect and is not intended to replace human or traditional translation methods. The official text is the English version of the LAPDonline.org® website. If any questions arise concerning the accuracy of the information presented by the translated version of the website, please refer to the English edition of the website, which is the official version.

Become a Fan

LAPD Blog RSS Feed

« Notes from the July 31, 2024 Police Commission Weekly Meeting | Main | Suspect Charged with 4 Counts of Attempted Murder on Police Officers After a 10-Minute Vehicle Pursuit »

July 31, 2024

Comments

All that really matters to me is this: do you care about Los Angeles Law Enforcement Officers, and do you have the courage to stand up for them? Because the last thing this city needs is another 2 demoralizing years with no support for the people that protect the citizens of Los Angeles. The rights of officers have been so trampled that the ACLU and Amnesty International should step up. You were sitting right there when Mr. Mack was dismissive and rude to me, Mr. Pacheco. Please explain what is different now.

Dang,

So what has changed. Nothing, may as well left Mack as president. Both canadates are worthless.

Well stated LA LEOS. I'm grateful that my department does not have a civilian over sight commission and if it did I would not stay on that department long. The LAPD needs a police chief that has civil service protections and is allowed to make decisions that are in support of its awesome police officers and not some gangster on the street who seems to have more rights then the police officer.

We need a cop as a Chief. We can't have a politician who is only looking out for his job. We have a Chief and a mayor who only look out for their butts. They don't have the best interest of their cops. We need a strong leader. We haven't had one in a long time. The men and women who protect this city and it's citizens deserve better. If we don't get it, then this city will never be as safe as it could be. Cops won't be aggressive against scumb bag criminals. They have families and will just do what they have to do to get by. OH sure the young guys with no complaints in their package will be aggressive at first. But wait a few years until they have a build up of bulls#@t complaints. Then they will slow down abit. This city needs a cop as a Chief. Not a politician who wants to wear our uniform. let me repeat that. WE DON'T NEED A POLITICIAN WHO JUST WANTS TO WEAR OUR UNIFORM. WE NEED A COP AS CHIEF OF POLICE!!!

I just saw that the City of Los Angeles continues to fail (no (F.S., "factor of safety") (NEVER DESIGN A SYSTEM WITHOUT REDUNDANT factor of safety TO NEVER POSSIBLY FAIL (PER "BACT" (BEST AVAILABLE COMMERCIAL TECHNOLOGY)??
Suppose any college graduate CAN write a standard SOP Boilerplate so that the new/OLD paycheck (OS) "operating system" can never fail. THE "RANK & FILE" HAS NO PAID LIQUIDATED DANAGES CLAUSES IN THEIR CONTRACT TO EACH EMPLOYEE OF THE RANK AND FILE FOR EACH FAILURE IN SUCH PUNISHMENT OF THE EMPLOYER THAT THE EMPLOYER WOULD NEVER MAKE SUCH A MISTAKE (MISTAKE IS IMPOSSIBLE!)) to produce State of California Business & Professions Code (17200 anticompetative practice, punish the rank and file by claim of mistake??), SURE LOOKS LOKE A MOBSTER ACTIVITY VIOLATION OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA PENAL CODE SECTION 186 ("California control of organized crime"); MINIMUM quality ACCURACY of paychecks to its employees who work for the (LA County Unified) School District sure looks like a mobster organized crime (pay what interest rate on rank and file funds seized by the city??) to create a City of L.A. (overall financial budget NOW FUNDED BY MONEY LAUNDERING OF EMPLOYEES FUNDS (PAY) USED AS) City overhead funded by claim of mysterious errors that cannot are not repaired, sure looks like maqnagment give lies and insubordination to seize all of the funds the employer can seize by the employer FROM THE RANK AND FILE for the ILLEGAL USE OF THE EMPLOYER. Looks like the City of L.A. is implementing the same m.o. as my employer (and decades ago what Bank of America did).

SOLUTION. GET YOUR RANK & FILE LIQUIDATED DAMAGES CLAUSES IN EACH CONTRACT WITH THE CITY?!!

Amen Anthony!!!

Stay Safe Warrior, inside and out!

Ed O'Shea

Erik, point of clarification, I am a civilian. Lots of us "get it". It is a mere observation, but it seems like many of you abdicate your personal authority and responsibility by wringing your hands over the actions or inactions of management. They are not your parents, and they all put their pants on one leg at a time. If the Chief can get enough money out of the feds to keep the department running, good enough. In my world, I keep my eye on the management closest to me. Anyone above him on the org chart is his problem, not mine. But I don't let him use his management by blaming them when he doesn't get me what I need to do the job. It seems like officers might benefit from using chain of command to their advantage... just a suggestion....

As residents in Marina del Rey, we feel we are the victims of business favoritism. We are disturbed by truck delivery noise in the middle of the night and the Municipal Codes designed to protect us are not enforsed. You could say that the police are understaffed and under budgeted and I would believe it, but that's not the entire story. Apparently, eventhough Panera Bread, a restaurant/bakery continuously violates the noise abatement laws, it's the practice of the police dept. to only cite on a same night call-back for the same offence. I can't get them to come out once!!! I'm suspicious that the police dept. has received some directive from the city to favor businesses over residents. Why? We pay plenty of property taxes to deserve protection. And let's face it; it doesn't help Los Angeles to produce frustrated people due to lack of sleep. Thank you.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Chief Charlie Beck

Text-A-Tip

WebTip


Nixle


June 2015

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30        

iWATCH